This dataset reflects all citizen complaints received by the Detroit Police Department (DPD) and the Board of Police Commissioners from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. The data are provided by the Office of the Chief Investigator (OCI), under the direction of the Board of Police Commissioners. The OCI receives, investigates, and resolves complaints regarding non-criminal allegations of misconduct against the DPD and its personnel. This dataset contains information about the nature of individual complaints, demographics for both the citizen filing the complaint and the officer against which the complaint is filed, and the resulting finding from the OCI investigation. In order to protect the privacy of both the officer and the citizen filing the complaint, no personally-identifiable information is displayed.As each case is allotted 90 days to complete an investigation, the dataset will be updated monthly with information from 90 days prior. For example, June 2016 data will be uploaded in early October 2016.Should you have questions about this dataset, you may contact the Office of the Chief Investigator at (313) 596-2499 or go to their website at: https://www.detroitmi.gov/How-Do-I/File/Chief-Investigator-Complaints.Click here for the Analytics Hub visualization of DPD Citizen Complaints.Field DescriptionsBPC or Board of Police Commissioners number: a unique identifier issued by the BPC to each case in numerical order after the case has been assigned to an Investigator, used for internal tracking purposes.CCR or Citizen Complaint Report number: the unique identifier automatically assigned to the case via the data management system.Report Date: date the complaint was filed.Entry: mode of entry for the complaint by the citizen.Age: age of the citizen filing the complaint.ctznRace: race of the citizen filing the complaint.ctznSex: sex of the citizen filing the complaint.Closed: date the investigation was completed by OCI.Unit: commanding unit of the officer against which the complaint was filed.Administrative Closure: administrative finding.Allegation: a claim as set forth by the citizen complaint.Finding: the disposition of a citizen complaint after investigation.ofcrRace: race of the officer against which the complaint was filed.ofcrSex: sex of the officer against which the complaint was filed.Allegation Type DescriptionsArrest: Complaint that the restraint of a person’s liberty was improper or unjustified.Demeanor: Complaint regarding a DPD member’s bearing, gesture, language, or other action, which is offensive or of doubtful social propriety, or gives the appearance of conflict of interest, misuse of influence, or lack of jurisdiction or authority.Entry: Complaint that entry into a building or onto property was improper and/or that excessive force was used against property to gain entry.Force: Complaint regarding the use or threatened use of force against a person.Harassment: Complaint that the method of police action was predicated upon factors irrelevant under the circumstances to good law enforcement decision-making (e.g., race, attire, sex, age) or complaint of improperly selective law enforcement on the basis of factors just listed.Procedure: Complaint regarding other actions in violation of DPD rules, regulations, procedures or policies, or the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics.Property: Complaint regarding property lost or damaged while in police custody or confiscated through police action.Search: Complaint that the search of a person or his/her property was improper, or in violation of established police procedure, or unjustified.Service: Complaint regarding the lack, tardiness or inadequacy of police service.Finding Type DescriptionsUnfounded: The investigation revealed no facts to support that the incident complained of actually occurred.Sustained: A preponderance of the evidence shows that the alleged conduct did occur and the actions of the officer violated DPD policies, procedures, or training.Not Sustained: There are insufficient facts to decide whether the alleged misconduct occurred.Exonerated: A preponderance of the evidence shows that the alleged conduct did occur but did not violate DPD policies, procedures or training.